t needs to take account of women's life context. The perinatal period should be considered a continuum, rather than seeing each part in isolation. For clinical practice, the review underlines the importance of distinguishing between PGP and LBP and offering appropriate, individualised support.Findings support the framework, but also provide evidence for some changes, thus further refining the framework. Women's wellbeing in the perinatal period (with regards to LPP, other issues, or generally) should not be considered in isolation, but needs to take account of women's life context. The perinatal period should be considered a continuum, rather than seeing each part in isolation. For clinical practice, the review underlines the importance of distinguishing between PGP and LBP and offering appropriate, individualised support. Communities and individuals widely vary in their resources and ability to respond to external stressors and insults. To identify vulnerable communities, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention developed the Social Vulnerability Index, an integrated tool to assess community resources and preparedness; it is based on 15 factors and includes individual scores in the following 4 themes socioeconomic status (theme 1), household composition and disability (theme 2), minority status and language (theme 3), and housing type and transportation (theme 4) and an overall composite score. Several Social Vulnerability Index components have been independently associated with an increased risk of preterm birth. We sought to investigate the association of the Social Vulnerability Index for each patient's residence during pregnancy, personal clinical risk factors, and preterm birth. This was a retrospective cohort study of women carrying nonanomalous singleton or twin gestations delivering at a large university he, 2.21 [95% confidence interval, 1.50-3.25]; adjusted odds ratio for composite major neonatal morbidity, 2.30 [95% confidence interval, 1.67-3.17]). Similar trends were seen for each Social Vulnerability Index theme. In addition, an increased adjusted odds ratio of composite major neonatal morbidity was recognized for each Social Vulnerability Index theme. Results were similar when Black race was removed from the models. The Social Vulnerability Index is a valuable tool that may further identify communities and individuals at the highest risk of preterm birth and may enable clinicians to integrate information regarding the local home environment of their patients to further refine preterm birth risk assessment.The Social Vulnerability Index is a valuable tool that may further identify communities and individuals at the highest risk of preterm birth and may enable clinicians to integrate information regarding the local home environment of their patients to further refine preterm birth risk assessment. Obstetrical hemorrhage is a leading cause of severe maternal morbidity, a key indicator of a nation's healthcare delivery system and often associated with a high rate of preventability. Limited data suggest that a patient's hemorrhage risk score may be associated with risk for maternal morbidity such as severe hemorrhage, intensive care unit admission, or transfusion. Little is known regarding the relationship between hemorrhage risk score and nontransfusion-related morbidity. We sought to evaluate the association between a patient's California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative admission hemorrhage risk score and severe maternal morbidity. This was a retrospective cohort of delivery admissions from 2018 to 2019 in a single healthcare network. Admission risk scores were assigned to each patient using the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative criteria. Rates of transfusion- and nontransfusion-associated severe maternal morbidity were compared across low-, medium-, and high-risk strata. We defintransfusion- and nontransfusion-associated severe maternal morbidity. Our findings imply that despite awareness and the identification of patients at high risk for obstetrical hemorrhage on admission, significant hemorrhage-associated morbidity persisted. Our data indicate that the identification of risk alone may be insufficient to reduce morbidity and imply that further work is needed to investigate and implement new practices in response to a patient's score stratum. Previous research supports an association between psychiatric diagnoses and adverse obstetrical and neonatal outcomes including low birthweight, preterm birth, and preeclampsia. Women who are admitted for inpatient psychiatric care are regarded as having more acute illnesses than those who are able to be managed as outpatients. Previous research has not yet investigated how the severity of psychiatric illness, as indicated by type of antenatal psychiatric care received, is associated with adverse obstetrical outcomes. This study examines whether the rates of adverse birth and obstetrical outcomes vary with the type of antenatal psychiatric care received when psychiatric care is indicated. Using a retrospective, observational design, information about women who gave birth between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2016 was captured from electronic medical records. Women were grouped as follows (1) those who received antepartum inpatient psychiatric treatment (n=148), (2) those with documented psychiatric 1]) than women with a psychiatric history who did not receive antepartum inpatient care even when adjusting for measured covariates. Receiving antepartum inpatient psychiatric care may promote positive birth outcomes for women with acutely severe psychiatric conditions.Receiving antepartum inpatient psychiatric care may promote positive birth outcomes for women with acutely severe psychiatric conditions. Gastroschisis is often complicated by fetal growth restriction, preterm delivery, and prolonged neonatal hospitalization. selleck compound Prenatal management and delivery decisions are often based on estimated fetal weight and interval growth; however, appropriate interval growth from week to week across gestation for these fetuses is poorly understood. This study aimed to determine the median increase in overall estimated fetal weight and individual biometric measurements across each week of gestation in pregnancies with fetal gastroschisis and to assess whether lower in utero fetal weight gain is predictive of postnatal growth or adverse neonatal outcomes. This was a retrospective cohort study of pregnancies with gastroschisis evaluated at 5 institutions of the University of California Fetal-Maternal Consortium from December 2014 to December 2019. The inclusion criteria were prenatally diagnosed gastroschisis with at least 1 ultrasound performed at a University of California Fetal-Maternal Consortium institution. Estimated fetal weight and individual biometric measurements were recorded for each ultrasound performed at a University of California Fetal-Maternal Consortium institution from the time of gastroschisis diagnosis to delivery.