Dose to medium in medium (Dm,m) is the preferred dose calculation and reporting framework. If an institution's planning system can only calculate dose to water in water (Dw,w), this is acceptable. A radical resection of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) or recurrent rectal cancer (RRC) can be challenging. In case of increased risk of an R1 resection, intra-operative brachytherapy (IOBT) can be applied. We evaluated the clinical selection strategy for IOBT. Between February 2007 and May 2018, 132 LARC/RRC patients who were scheduled for surgery with IOBT standby, were evaluated. By intra-operative inspection of the resection margin and MR imaging, it was determined whether a resection was presumed to be radical. Frozen sections were taken on indication. In case of a suspected R1 resection, IOBT (1×10Gy) was applied. Histopathologic evaluation, treatment and toxicity data were collected from medical records. Tumour was resected in 122 patients. IOBT was given in 42 patients of whom 54.8% (n=23) had a histopathologically proven R1 resection. Of the 76 IOBT-omitted R0 resected patients, 17.1% (n=13) had a histopathologically proven R1 resection. In 4 IOBT-omitted patients, a clinical R1/2 resection was seen. In total, correct clinical judgement occurred in 72.6% (n=88) of patients. In LARC, 58.3% (n=14) of patients were overtreated (R0, with IOBT) and 10.9% (n=5) were undertreated (R1, without IOBT). In RRC, 26.5% (n=9) of patients were undertreated. In total, correct clinical judgement occurred in 72.6% (n=88). However, in 26.5% (n=9) RRC patients, IOBT was unjustifiedly omitted. IOBT is accompanied by comparable and acceptable toxicity. Therefore, we recommend IOBT to all RRC patients at risk of an R1 resection as their salvage treatment.In total, correct clinical judgement occurred in 72.6% (n = 88). However, in 26.5% (n = 9) RRC patients, IOBT was unjustifiedly omitted. IOBT is accompanied by comparable and acceptable toxicity. Therefore, we recommend IOBT to all RRC patients at risk of an R1 resection as their salvage treatment. Setup variations and anatomical changes can severely affect the quality of head and neck intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatments. The impact of these changes can be alleviated by increasing the plan's robustness a priori, or by adapting the plan online. This work compares these approaches in the context of head and neck IMPT. A representative cohort of 10 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients with daily cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was evaluated. For each patient, three IMPT plans were created 1- a classical robust optimization (cRO) plan optimized on the planning CT, 2- an anatomical robust optimization (aRO) plan additionally including the two first daily CBCTs and 3- a plan optimized without robustness constraints, but online-adapted (OA) daily, using a constrained spot intensity re-optimization technique only. The cumulative dose following OA fulfilled the clinical objective of both the high-risk and low-risk clinical target volumes (CTV) coverage in all 10 patients, compared to 8 for aRO and 4 for cRO. aRO did not significantly increase the dose to most organs at risk compared to cRO, although the integral dose was higher. OA significantly reduced the integral dose to healthy tissues compared to both robust methods, while providing equivalent or superior target coverage. Using a simple spot intensity re-optimization, daily OA can achieve superior target coverage and lower dose to organs at risk than robust optimization methods.Using a simple spot intensity re-optimization, daily OA can achieve superior target coverage and lower dose to organs at risk than robust optimization methods.Radiotherapy, in addition to surgery and systemic chemotherapy, remains the core of the current clinical management of cancer. Radioresistance is one of the major causes of disease progression and mortality in cancer; therefore, it is a significant challenge in the treatment of locally advanced, recurrent and metastatic cancer. Epigenetic mechanisms that control hallmarks of cancer have a key role in the development of radiation resistance of cancer cells. Recent advances in DNA methylation, histone modification, chromatin remodeling and non-coding RNAs identified in the control of signal transduction pathways in cancer and cancer stem cells have provided even greater promise in the improvement of understanding cancer radioresistance. Many epigenetic drugs that target epigenetic enzymes revert the radioresistant phenotypes decreasing the possibility that resistant cancer cells will develop refractory tumors to radiotherapy. Epigenetic profiles identified as regulators of DNA damage repair, hypoxia, cell survival, apoptosis and invasion are determinants in the development of tumor radioresistance; hence, they also are promising in personalized medicine to develop novel targeted therapies or biomarkers to follow-up the effectiveness of radiotherapy. Now, it is clear that radiotherapy can influence a complex epigenetic network for transcriptional reprogramming, enabling the cells to adapt and avoid the effect of radiotherapy. This review aims to highlight the epigenetic modifications identified in cancer radioresistance and to discuss approaches to disable epigenetic networks to increase the sensitivity and specificity of radiotherapy. The goal of the present study was to investigate the effect of deep regional hyperthermia on early and long-term oncological outcomes in the context of preoperative radiochemotherapy in rectal cancer. In this prospective phase II trial, patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were treated with 5-fluorouracil based preoperative radiochemotherapy with 50.4Gy in 28 fractions. Deep regional hyperthermia was scheduled twice weekly. Pathological tumor regression was scored according to the Dworak regression system. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR). learn more Further endpoints were local control (LC), distant control (DC), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Hyperthermia was defined as feasible if 70% of patients received at least eight treatments. Quality of life was assessed at follow-up by the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 questionnaires. Time to event data was analyzed according to Kaplan-Meier based on first-events. The study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02353858).