Objectives Patients with Crohn's disease often produce antibodies against flagellated intestinal bacteria. There are mixed data as to whether such antibodies are present in patients with spondyloarthritis. Our objectives were to evaluate for the presence of antibodies against intestinal organisms in children with enthesitis related arthritis (ERA). Methods Children with ERA and healthy controls were recruited at three sites. Sera were plated on a nitrocellulose array and incubated with labelled antibodies to human IgA and IgG. Results At UAB, patients and controls had similar antibody levels against the majority of the bacteria selected, with the exception of increased IgA antibodies among ERA patients against Prevotella oralis (1231 [IQR 750, 2566] versus 706 [IQR 428, 1106], p = .007.) These findings were partially validated at a second but not at a third site. Conclusions ERA patients may produce increased IgA antibodies against P. oralis. The possible significance of this finding bears further exploration.Purpose Ewing sarcoma of the pelvis is associated with inferior local control compared with those arising from other primary sites. Despite its increased use, outcome data for treatment with proton therapy remain limited. We report 3-year disease control and toxicity in pediatric patients treated with proton therapy. Methods and materials Thirty-five patients aged ≤21 years (median, 14 years) with nonmetastatic pelvic Ewing sarcoma received proton therapy and chemotherapy between 2010 and 2018. Overall survival and tumor control rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A log-rank test assessed significance between strata of prognostic factors. Significant toxicity was reported per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. Results Most patients received definitive radiation (n = 26; median dose 55.8 Gy relative biological effectiveness [RBE]; range, 54.0-64.8), 7 received preoperative radiation (50.4 Gy RBE), and 2 received postoperative radiation (45 Gy RBE and 54 Gy RBE). Te escalation without significant toxicity, which may contribute to the favorable outcomes. Combined surgery and radiation therapy, particularly preoperative radiation, is associated with postoperative complications, but not survival, compared with radiation alone.Purpose After publication of the radiation field design in the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial, a radiation therapy quality assurance review was integrated into the Intergroup-Sentinel-Mamma (INSEMA) trial. We aimed to investigate the role of patient characteristics, extent of axillary surgery, and radiation techniques for dose distribution in ipsilateral axillary levels. Methods and materials INSEMA (NCT02466737) has randomized 5542 patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery. Of these, 276 patients from 108 radiation therapy facilities were included in the central review, using the planning records of the first 3 patients treated at each site. Results Of the 276 patients, 41 had major deviations (ie, no axillary contouring or submission of insufficient records) leading to exclusion. A total of 235 (85.1%) radiation therapy planning records were delineated according to the INSEMA protocol, including 9 (3.8%) cases with minor deviations. At least 25% of INSEMA patients were unintentionally treated with ≥95% of the prescribed breast radiation dose in axillary level I. Approximately 50% of patients were irradiated with a median radiation dose of more than 85% of prescription dose in level I. Irradiated volumes and applied doses were significantly lower in levels II and III compared with level I. However, 25% of patients still received a median radiation dose of ≥75% of prescription dose to level II. Subgroup analysis revealed a significant association between incidental radiation dose in the axilla and obesity. Younger age, boost application, and fractionation schedule showed no impact on axillary dose distribution. read more Conclusions Assuming ≥80% of prescribed breast dose as the optimal dose for curative radiation of low-volume disease in axillary lymph nodes, at least 50% of reviewed INSEMA patients received an adequate dose in level I, even with contemporary 3-dimensional techniques. Dose coverage was much less in axillary levels II and III, and far below therapeutically relevant doses.Clinicians are looking for a reliable prognostic marker for patients with COVID-19.•In our cohort, clinical improvement was predicted by younger age and a NLR below 3.•Transfer to ICU was instead predicted by a NLR over 4 (p=0.046).•NLR is a fast, widely available and relatively inexpensive assessment.•NLR may be a useful tool in the early screening of patients with COVID-19.At the outset and during the throes of the COVID-19 pandemic, as valuable resources are channeled to combat the pandemic, challenges in timely delivery of non-COVID-19-related health care services such as endovascular service arise. As such, this article looks at a tertiary institution's experience in managing its endovascular workload-referenced to the American College of Surgeons' triage of vascular surgery patient acuity-based case classification.We report a patient who presented with acute abdominal pain during the COVID-19 pandemic. His work-up revealed rupture of a 5.8 cm abdominal aortic aneurysm. He also had fever, cough, and shortness of breath and radiologic evidence of COVID-19 infection. After careful consideration, he underwent successful endovascular repair under local anesthesia with good short-term results.Background COVID-19 pandemic has the potential to significantly affect the mental health of healthcare workers (HCWs), who stand in the frontline of this crisis. It is, therefore, an immediate priority to monitor rates of mood, sleep and other mental health issues in order to understand mediating factors and inform tailored interventions. The aim of this review is to synthesize and analyze existing evidence on the prevalence of depression, anxiety and insomnia among HCWs during the Covid-19 outbreak. Methods A systematic search of literature databases was conducted up to April 17th, 2020. Two reviewers independently assessed full-text articles according to predefined criteria. Risk of bias for each individual study was assessed and data pooled using random-effects meta-analyses to estimate the prevalence of specific mental health problems. The review protocol is registered in PROSPERO and is available online. Findings Thirteen studies were included in the analysis with a combined total of 33,062 participants.