The aim of the present study was to investigate various aspects of tiagabine (TGB) effectiveness in Bulgarian patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. This open, prospective study recruited the patients with epilepsy attending the Clinic of Neurology at the University Hospital of Plovdiv, Bulgaria. The patients completed diaries about the seizure frequency, severity, and adverse events. There were regular documented visits at 3 or 6 months during the first year of treatment with TGB and at 6 months or 1 year afterwards, with dynamic assessment of seizure frequency, severity, adverse events, and EEG recordings. TGB was applied as an add-on treatment in 43 patients (24 males, mean age 39 years). There was relatively mild and transient dynamic improvement of seizure severity, satisfactory seizure frequency reduction in 32.6% of participants, stable mean seizure frequency reduction (40-50%) from month 6 to month 24 and a stable response rate (52.3-50%) during the same period. New seizure types (myoclonic, myoclonic-atonic) occurred in 2 patients. The final clinical efficacy was higher in patients with initial monotherapy. There were adverse events (dizziness/vertigo, sedation, memory impairment, loss of appetite and weight, confusion, psychosis, insomnia, transient diplopia, lymphadenomegaly, rash, nausea, depression, anxiety, tremor of hands, unstable gait, legs edema, thrombocytopenia, cervical muscles tightening) in 26.19% of patients. In conclusion, TGB treatment is associated with low and transient improvement of seizure severity, good and stable improvement of seizure frequency, possible worsening of seizure control, possible appearance of new seizure types, and acceptable safety and tolerability. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.BACKGROUND Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) migrate and transmigrate to acute liver failure (ALF) area due to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) stimulation as an attractant molecule then actively giving the paracrine signaling and or differentiating into primary hepatocytes, however the best route of MSCs transplanted to liver injury area remains unclear. AIM In this study we compare intravenous (IV) and intraperitoneal (IP) route of MSCs administration by analyzing serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT), serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) and bilirubin level as improvement markers of liver function and VEGF as attractant-proliferation molecule on days 2 and 5. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighteen male Sprague-Dawley rats weighting 200 g were used in this study. They were divided in three study groups vehicle control, IP and IV groups. The IV group was treated by MSCs at dose 1×106 by lateral tail vein injection and IP group received 1×106 MSCs via IP injection. The level of SGPT, SGOT and bilirubin were measured by an automatic analyzer, the VEGF level using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), while the CD73 expression was evaluated using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS This study showed that IV injection of MSCs was more efficient for increasing liver function than IP treatment group that confirmed by the observed significant decrease in SGPT, SGOT and bilirubin level on days 2 and 5 (p less then 0.001). This effect was most likely mediated by the significant increase of VEGF level (p less then 0.05) on days 2 and 5. CONCLUSION Our result conclude that an IV administration of MSCs was more efficacious than the IP administration for liver injury regeneration. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.INTRODUCTION The European League Against Rheumatism updates the recommendations for managing rheumatoid arthritis. Again, it is not specified which DAS28 is there in view (with erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein). AIM The aim of the study is to check whether Disease Activity Score-28 (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and Disease Activity Score-28 (C-reactive protein) represent equally the activity of rheumatoid arthritis in the course of treatment with biological agents. SSR128129E molecular weight MATERIALS AND METHODS In a retrospective study we analyzed the database of real clinical practice over a 12-month period of biological treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Disease Activity Score-28 (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and (C-reactive protein) are compared at the start and at the end of the study. RESULTS The mean difference between the two variants of disease activity scores at baseline and at the end of the study is significant (p less then 0.001). The Disease Activity Score-28 (erythrocyte sedimentation rate) represents a remarkably small proportion of patients with remission and low activity ( less then 3.2) at baseline (18.46%) and at the end of the study (40.51%). Disease Activity Score-28 (C-reactive protein) represents a significantly high proportion of patients in remission and low activity ( less then 3.2) at the end of the study (69.74%). Estimates of activity according to the two variants show significant discrepancy between each other and low level of agreement (kappa = 0.235-0.464). Discrepancies are not related to the type of biological drug (anti-TNF or not). CONCLUSION The two DAS28 variants are not interchangeable with the same threshold for low activity in measuring the response to biological therapy. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.BACKGROUND The purpose of the present study was to produce a pcDNA3.1(+)-ureA recombinant vector and evaluate the capacity of this vector to stimulate the immune response against H. pylori infection in infused BALB/c mice. MATERIALS AND METHODS The pcDNA3.1(+)-ureA construct was prepared and transformed into E. coli, successfully. The animals we used in the study were allotted into three groups for infusion of 1) recombinant plasmid, 2) pcDNA3.1(+)-ureA + nanoparticles, and 3) pcDNA3.1(+). Blood and tissue specimens from each group of mice were collected at days 15, 30, and 45 after the last infusion and the expression levels of cytokines such as TGF-β1, IL-4, and IFNγ genes comparing to GAPDH as well as the expression of ureA in the mice’s thigh muscle were evaluated. RESULTS The genes expression analysis showed that the IL4 expression significantly decreased (p0.05). CONCLUSION The pcDNA3.1(+)-ureA recombinant vector with or without chitosan nanoparticles can stimulate the immune response in animal models against H.