Objective Achieving high levels of primary implant stability is considered to be desirable, despite some studies warning of the risk of bone damage. It was the goal of this observational clinical study to compare two current bone level implant systems with respect to primary and secondary stability. Method and materials Data on bone quality, insertion torque, implant stability at insertion and after healing, as well as number of implants lost during healing were obtained from two centers either placing BLT (Bone Level Tapered, Straumann) or Nobel Parallel CC (Nobel Biocare) implants. Statistical analysis was based on Spearman rank correlation tests, analysis of variance, and t tests with the level of significance set at α = .05. Results A total of 312 BLT and 92 Nobel Parallel CC implants were placed. Ten BLT and two Nobel Parallel CC implants failed resulting in survival rates of 96.79% and 97.83%, respectively. Mean insertion torque recorded in the different bone classes showed large standard deviations, and only torque values for BLT implants recorded in type 3 bone differed significantly from type 2 bone and type 1 bone (P = .024). For BLT implants, bone quality and insertion torque correlated (Spearman rho = -.3326; P = .0023) as did ISQ at insertion (Spearman rho = -.2241; P = .0429). Implant diameter significantly affected primary (P = .0013) and secondary (P = .0050) stability of Nobel Parallel CC implants while for BLT implants a significant effect was only seen for secondary stability (P = .0000). Bone quality had a significant effect on implant insertion torque for BLT implants (P = .0059). Bone quality had no general effect on ISQ changes during healing but 3.3-mm BLT implants showed significantly (P = .0005) lower stability after healing. Conclusion Huge variation with respect to primary and secondary stability seems to exist among similar looking implant systems clinically used for identical indications.Objective This study analyzed two xenogenous biomaterials based on deproteinized bovine bone mineral applied for maxillary sinus elevation. Method and materials Fourteen patients were submitted to maxillary sinus augmentation with one of the following biomaterials Criteria Lumina Bone Porous (test group) or Geistlich Bio-Oss (control group), both of large granules (1 to 2 mm). After 6 months, trephine biopsies were collected at the time of implant placement 27 samples (11 patients) in the test group; 7 samples (3 patients) in the control group. Biopsies were analyzed by descriptive histology and histomorphometry, in which the percentages of newly formed bone, residual biomaterial particles, and connective tissue were evaluated. Results Histomorphometry showed means for test and control groups, respectively, of 32.41% ± 9.42% and 26.59% ± 4.88% for newly formed bone, 22.89% ± 4.58% and 25.00% ± 4.81% for residual biomaterial, and 44.70% ± 9.54% and 48.41% ± 3.36% for connective tissue. There were no differences between groups (P > .05). Conclusion This study concluded that Criteria Lumina Bone Porous presented similar histologic and histomorphometric characteristics to Geistlich Bio-Oss 6 months after sinus elevation surgery, identifying the tested biomaterial as an interesting alternative for bone augmentation in the maxillary sinus.Objective Calcified carotid artery atheroma (CCAA) detected by panoramic radiographs has been suggested as an accurate biomarker for cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs). However, there has not been agreement on the relationship between CCAA and risk for stroke or other CVA. Method and materials The question asked was, "Are patients with CCAA detected on panoramic radiographs more likely to get a stroke or CVA in the future compared to those who do not have CCAA and, further, would Doppler ultrasonography of the neck obtained secondary to panoramic radiography in suspected individuals add value to this association with stroke or CVA?" This meta-analysis was conducted by searching PubMed, Ovid Medline, Dentistry & Oral Sciences Source, CINAHL, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Six studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in the final analysis; three used panoramic radiography and the rest used panoramic radiography and ultrasonography. Multiple random effect meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan 5.2 software. Conclusion Evidence from this meta-analysis shows that although detection of CCAA via panoramic radiography to predict risk for stroke may be comparable to Doppler ultrasonography, risk prediction is somewhat more significant when diagnostic confirmation is made using Doppler ultrasonography than panoramic radiography alone. Clinical implications Because stroke risk assessment is complicated and comprises many additional systemic factors beyond calcification of the carotid artery, CVA prediction is more reliable when Doppler ultrasonography is used after panoramic radiography. Managing hypertension, diabetes, and smoking habit are far more important in risk management of patients with CCAA detection on panoramic radiography.Objectives The prevalence of "dental anxiety" (DA) is often underestimated and numerous diagnostic methods are available for dental practitioners. It is difficult to differentiate between a dental phobia requiring an interdisciplinary approach and DA, which can be managed by dental practitioners alone. The appropriate use of diagnostic tools is key for the successful management of highly anxious and/or phobic patients. The aim was to provide a guideline to recognize dental fear and to differentiate DA from patients who are highly anxious or even have a phobia. Data sources In total, 8,929 articles that were selected for the development of the German guidelines for "Dental anxiety in adults" in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and MedPilot were filtered for diagnosis of DA disorder. The focus for this review was on the use of scales to measure DA levels. The methods and tools used in the 51 reviewed articles to assess DA levels were evaluated in terms of their practicability and suitability in daily practice to differentiate between phobia (ie, DA disorder) and nonpathologic anxiety. In addition, the internal consistency (Cronbach alpha) of the questionnaires/tools was determined. N6F11 mouse Conclusion All identified DA questionnaires validated in the German language had an acceptable to excellent internal consistency (0.7 to 0.986). The only validated questionnaire-free method was galvanic skin reaction measurement. For the assessment of DA and diagnosis of a DA disorder in adults, the survey by means of any suitable questionnaire or even several questionnaires in combination with a behavioral observation of the patient is currently the method of choice.